Hero sits with a winning, moderately aggressive image and covers everyone at the table. Some straddling and most players are 200BB+ deep.
V1 is somewhat maniacal but has been losing during the evening and is short stack with ~$700 effective
V2 is new to hero and seems fairly ABC, haven't seen him out of line with post-flop aggression as of yet, ~$1700 effective
Hero opens to $20 UTG+1 with 9♣ 9♥ , v1 calls from MP, v2 calls from HJ and BB all call
Flop (80): 8♣ 9♠ Q♦, BB checks, hero bets 60, v1 calls, v2 raises to 130. BB folds, hero calls, v1 calls.
I felt V1 was likely to call here and was concerned that if I 3 bet and V2 jams I would likely be in a bad spot.
Turn (470): 5♣ Hero checks, v1 now bets $225, v2 again min raises to $450. I call, v1 raises his remaining $110, v2 calls, and I call.
I tanked for a while on this one and after realizing that v1 cannot reraise, decide to call and try to boat up, feeling that one of the two certainly had JT and if V2 had it and I boated, he might not be able to lay it down to a shove given remaining stack of ~$1K into what would be a $2K pot on river.
Would you have played either street differently?
Comments on all streets welcome will post results later.