really enjoying all of your videos Ki, but I do have a question about the one vs Klodnicki.
You assigned him a range that is closer to what you would 3bet from the CO, therefore a rather optimal range. I have noticed similar ranging in other videos. Don't you feel you should range him tighter, as you mentioned a few times, that he is rather tight and I would assume straightforward?
If this is the case, would he really be 3betting polar here? I would believe his range is going to be more linear.
Shouldn't we always feed the solver with more realistic ranges as it already pretty hard in itself to interpret the solver results, as the solver will play optimally with the settings given, but no villain ever comes close to this?
Hope my question is understandable.