2/3 600 cap. 710 effective. Game is playing loose especially pre flop. Not many 3bet pots.
V1 is a good winning player able to mix it up and can recognize opponents hand ranges. Is able to put you in tough spots.
V2 is probably a small losing player. Has good card sense but is way to wide pre flop. Will defend almost 100% of opens to 3bets. Haven’t seen him 3bet light tonight but likes to squeeze from the straddle very wide.
V1 makes it 15 UTG. Loose rec and tight rec both call. V2 makes it $75 from hijack. I’m in cutoff with Ac Ks.
Do we we 4 bet or flat? If we flat what should we do facing a 4bet. If we 4bet what size do you like?
Comments
Think for a moment: what would we flat here? Anything at all?
I am rather more likely to consider flatting with suited AK than offsuit. With offsuit cards there is rather less postflop playability, and so there is more imperative, if we play at all, to take down the pot here and now; and if we can't do that, at least get the pot heads-up.
We block both AA and KK, cutting half the number of combos of those hands any villain might have, and increases the likelihood that we would get a fold (compared to if we held, say, QQ).
You say the villain calls too many 3-bets. What do you know about their own 3-betting range, apart from it being wide from a straddle in squeeze spots? That is the critical judgment here.
If their 3-betting range is really tight, like {KK+, AKs, AKo}, then maybe we should be considering folding, rather than flatting or 4-betting. If their range is sufficiently wide, then we can 4-bet/call. (The only time we should be folding to a 5-bet is if we believe their 5-betting range is just {AA}.) How wide is "sufficiently wide"? play around with Flopzilla to find out.
Bottom line: I do not think our choice is between 4-betting and flatting; I think it is between 4-betting and folding.
Good comments above as well. Fold vs nits is probably fine, but otherwise we can pick up a bunch of pesos with a 4!.